And he did it. He created the perfect feeling of love, connection with the Soul, both emotional and physical; a love encompassing perfect eroticism (not just emotionless sex).

And in the end, he did what lovers do: he joined with other people. Yes, they absorbed him entirely, meaning that he became part of them, just as a person in love wishes to become part of his or her lover. But HE represented the very *concept* of love, and his physical absorption by the common people represents their ultimate adoption and understanding of that concept.

Of course, this is an art movie and everything in it is symbolical.

It amounts to a description of what love is and how it works. The movie is saying that love is something real which *can* be defined and understood, and the ultimate consequence of such understanding is that people join with each other (emotionally and sexually). Even if they are strangers. Because everybody is capable of feeling love, and one day maybe everybody will.

It's a beautiful movie. When I left the theater I hadn't pieced everything together yet, and thought I'd rate it an 8 out of 10. But having slept on it, I realized it was a perfect movie. Hence, I must give it a 10 out of 10."

"The novel PERFUME by Susskind, came out about twenty years ago, and was one of those international sensations blending a mystery with the feel and texture of an historical novel, and adding either theological tones (THE NAME OF THE ROSE) or philosophy (PERFUME). From the start the society of the 18th Century is disheartening. It is not the world of the philosophers but the French equivalent of WIlliam Hogarth's "Gin Lane" and "The Rakes Progress". Drunkeness, whores, thieves, violent death, filth, is everywhere (to the point that the viewer can nearly smell everything). Everybody who gets the early Jean Baptiste are not likable people. The woman running the orphanage is greedy and quick to whip the kids (they sense something wrong with Jean Baptiste, and try to smother him - smart kids!)"

"I felt this movie was well acted and as true to the book as it could be. It has a running time of over two hours and none of the minutes are wasted. Historically, it was very true. It has a very beautiful look, despite a lot of the film takes place in Paris slums.

As for the plot line, I love it. It isn't the typical murder story. A guy, blessed with the ability to know all scents, has no scent of his own. He gets whiff of a young girl selling fruit and is taken aback by it. Of course, trying to get full account of her scent, he accidentally kills her, but then realizes he needs her in order to make the world's most seductive perfume, love itself. I was happy they included an orgy scene in this film, anything less would have ruined the point of this film. Even when the main character makes a perfume that is distilled love from the virgins he murdered and people will bow down to him, it still doesn't make him love anyone. He still feels unloved."
 

Above you can see the impression which other people see in this movie.

All people are not the same...

People can access the energy of Enlightenment by Bhakti or Love which says, not my Will but thy Will be done.

By Karma Yoga which does not take the Fruit of its Action.

By Mantra Yoga. By Hatha Yoga or Discipline, or by Kundalini Yoga Meditation;

They say that you can become Illuminated on any one of the Paths, but then you become Master of ALL the Paths..

In order to throw the Money Lenders out of the Temple!!

Like Gnani Yoga, the Yoga of Knowledge...

THE THREE EVOLUTIONARY TYPES IN DANTES DIVINE COMEDY -

GRENOUILLE THE VAMPIRE AS INHABITANT OF DANTES INFERNO - PLATO'S BRONZE SOULS, WITH A DISCUSSION OF DANTES PURGATORY - PLATO'S SILVER SOULS, AND DANTES PARADISE - PLATOS GOLDEN SOULS - THE ILLUMINATED, THE ENLIGHTENED - ENERGY ENHANCEMENT!!

Dante and Plato divide people into three different types corresponding to their evolution, corresponding to their philosophy, corresponding to negative karmic mass - Trauma - formed, of course.

The Commedia (later called "The Divine Comedy," after Dante's death) is organized into three sections of thirty-three successive cantos each. The term "successive" is crucial. In each section, the ordering of the successive cantos reflects an ordering-principle of evolution, of philosophy, of a way of being.

This ordering-principle is properly termed a "transfinite" in the most rigorous sense of the mathematician Cantor's intent. And the transfinite corresponds to an ordering principle, an evolutionary philosophy which cannot be created from below, but can only be seen from above.

The person who is higher always can understand and therefore forgive, love, the person who is lower.

The person who is evolutionary lower can never understand the person who is higher and therefore like Jesus Christ they say, "I suppose you think you're really good don't you?" "Well, I'll show you!!" from the story of the Monkey in my commentary on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. 

That is why Christ was crucified which happens with all the enlightened Masters who show themselves. That is why the enlightened always say, "It takes one to know one".

In Energy Enhancement we call these Cantorian transfinite ordering principles the chakras above the head, each one hierarchically higher than the last. Each one, higher than the mind, working from the principle of intuition and higher - Chit-Shakti - Intelligent Energy.

Each section of the Commedia is ordered by a different transfinite ordering-principle, evolutionary philosophy, each differing essentially from the other two. The succession of sections represents a third ordering-principle, that which is relatively transfinite in respect to the subsumed three as predicates of this higher-order transfinite.

However, the ordering-principle (conception) embodied in the thirty-third canto of the final section, the "Empyreal," is in agreement with the higher-order transfinite ordering the three sections as a whole. That agreement defines the proper conclusion of the successive development the entire composition.

The configuration is strictly Platonic in all essential features of organization--although the details are, of course, not precisely in agreement with Plato.

In the first section, the "Inferno," the ordering of cantos leads us into the Pit.

This is, of course, an unsatisfactory conclusion of progress to all but the most degraded, masochistic Dionysians. The reaching of the pit demonstrates that the characteristic ordering-principle of the "Inferno" is not acceptable for mankind. The principle to be superseded is that of heteronomic, irrationalist forms of egoistical sensuality.

One case, that of Count Ugolino, is worth citing here. Ugolino, thrown into prison by persecutors, survives for a while by eating his children, for which he is condemned to pass eternity perpetually gnawing on a skull. Egoistical, heteronomic sensuality superseded all reason or even rational morality in Ugolino. So, like one of the "bronze souls" of the "Phoenician myths" in Plato's Republic, Ugolino lives in the hell of perpetually being what he is.

Today, such moral degenerates, like other denizens of the "Inferno," are known euphemistically as "political pragmatists." The wretched fate their impulses produce in the world--whether in international relations, national policy, or personal affairs--is the only consequence of the successful realization of their irrational, greedy impulses for heteronomically motivated advantage.

The principle of, "Eating ones children" is the principle of the Energy Vampire, the Psychopath Sociopath.

Vampires do not create anything because they do not have a Soul. In Hebrew such a person without a Soul, is called a Golem, like Gollum of the, "Lord of the Rings". They simply eat everything created by others.

In this type of infernal society, we use the vampire principle to eat, vampirise everything else.

1. The principle of Usury where incredible rates of interest (Anything greater than 1% per year) pass on to privately owned banks and bankers to eat all the young shoots of growth.

2. The Ponzi Scheme or consciously created Market Bubbles which have been a constant theme of robbers since Ancient Babylon and Rome, where people are persuaded to invest in, "Sure things" which then fail. The robbers always know when to get out and thus, "Sell High", and then can, "Buy Cheap", when the market has crashes. Recent examples of eating ones children are..

a). The Savings and Loans Swindle.

b). Then Enron which failed and the Company was eaten and its Pension Scheme - like all Pension Schemes, made to be eaten - was eaten.

c). Then the Housing Bubble and its securitization where people were cozened in to buying a house with cheap interest rates creating incredible bonuses for the mortgage sellers, which interest rates then went higher so they could no longer pay the mortgage. The mortgages were securitized and sold on to create incredible bonuses for the bankers,  then after the crash the worthless toxic assets were bought by the government with your taxes. The  foreclosed houses were then bought cheap by people who had sold high.

3. The Principle of Tax whereby the entrenched Vampire Oligarchy creates its Vampire Bureaucracy, Slave Population and Psychopathic Army.

This vampire principle of the First Canto - Inferno - must be rejected, negated, as a whole.

The correct policy of Survival and Correct Evolution of the Human Race in a World of Richness and Plenty demands it!!

The Creation of Golden Souls through Energy Enhancement Advanced Evolutionary Techniques Based upon Ancient Methods from all the World's Evolutionary Paths is a method of World Evolution, Human Survival, Path Completion - and it Works - Just Read our Course Reports!!

That discovery is embodied in the first canto of the next section, "Purgatory." With this higher ordering principle, that of greed, of sensual appetites informed by logical forms of knowledge, by discipline, one proceeds to a second dead end, "Earthly Paradise." or Existentialism. This is neither hell nor is it the end humanity requires, Purgatory's ordering principle is superseded through a turn to the first canto of the final section, "Paradise." The achievement of the "Empyreal" through that ordering-principle brings us to the desired condition of human existence, the agreement of thought and practice with the higher ordering-principle which is demonstrated by the overall course of progress from infantile sensuality to reason. The fact that the conception coincides with that higher ordering-principle demonstrates sufficient reason, that we have reached the proper condition of human willful governance of human conduct.

The Commedia thus presents itself to the knowledgeable reader as a perfect Platonic dialogue.

The same principles are brilliantly realized in another of the greatest works of literary composition, the Don Quixote of Miguel Cervantes. The subject of the book is the effort to develop Sancho Panza, a bestial peasant predominantly occupied with stuffing his fat paunch (Panza), to the point that Sancho is qualified to govern a province, or, the same thing, an island. Or, how to bring the Spanish people out of rural imbecility in moral outlook, so that those people might become qualified to govern themselves. This book is organized on three levels: Don Quixote the character, the Moor who is the fictionally attributed author, and Cervantes himself.

Beethoven's sole opera, Fidelio, is organized conceptually according to the same Platonic-dialogue principles. More important, the entire development of the well-tempered system of counterpoint in music, identified by John Bull, Sweelinck, Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven (notably), has its origins in Plato's musical faction, and was mediated into Europe through al-Farabi.

Thus, today, in many branches of art we are confronted with worthless productions called "art," whose attributed value depends upon ignorant, misplaced plausible explanations for the actual artistic productions of some earlier period.

First, that there are only three rigorously distinguishable moral types of individual personality and culture, corresponding to the "Inferno," "Purgatory," and "Paradise" of Dante Alighieri's Commedia.

Second, that these three moral types correspond to the primary combinations possible of two, opposing principles - Republican versus Oligarchical.

The latter two, opposing principles are implicitly the divine spark of creative-mental potential within each human individual, opposed to the bestial impulse ["original sin"] of irrationalistic hedonism ["anarchism," "existentialism"] also embedded in that same individual. Most notably, these three types are discussed under the heading of "Phoenician myths," by Socrates, in Plato's Republic. The same matter is treated by St. Augustine.

In the instance of the maturation of the individual within the setting of a moral form of society or culture, loving instruction of the anarchistic infant by the parents and others, nurtures the divine spark within the infant and child. By loving always only that in the infant and child which corresponds to the development and exercise of the divine spark, the new individual is encouraged to adopt the identity of a lovable personality accordingly. Maturation acquires thus the form of the new individual's inner struggle between the growing power of the divine spark and the opposing, bestial, impulses of anarchistic hedonism.  Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand," and Jeremy Bentham's hedonistic principle of his and John Stuart Mill's felicitous calculus (utilitarianism), are examples of advocacy of immorality.

While Adam Smith's work itself, was a fraud from top to bottom, Smith was, therefore, only perversely "sincere" in his presenting that specific kind of delusion shared among such among his dupes as both an Adam Smith fanatic Karl Marx and our own Wall Street ideologues today. That is to emphasize, what Smith himself wrote in a crucial passage of his 1759 Theory of Moral Sentiments.

To wit, we have the following passage:

... Hunger, thirst, the passion which unites the two sexes, the love of pleasure, and the dread of pain, prompt us to apply [these desires] for their own sakes, and without any consideration of their tendency to those beneficent ends which the great Director of nature intended to produce by them.

Adam Smith, thus, presents us with what is, in fact, the widely accepted, but wickedly incompetent conception of "money," a folly which has been prevalent throughout the world affairs up to this present time.

The popular desire for money as such, or the equivalent, has been, thus, the kind of passion which attaches the typically suggestible, economics-ignorant devotees of Wall and Threadneedle Streets to the delusion that either the means called "money," or a notion of the kindred power to purchase and to consume, is the measure of the political system of values by which a nation, or nations, might be ruled presently. Hence, as history demonstrates: with most people, most of the time, the result is, that their tendency is, in effect, to impair the quality of judgment which might have otherwise made them fit to rule themselves.

The combined effects of the works of science and related statecraft of Brunelleschi and of Nicholas of Cusa, expressed the inclusion of principles of organization in statecraft which had never existed within post-Plato European civilization earlier. The effect of the revolutionary change expressed, chiefly, by the impact of the work of Cusa, produced a specific kind of effect which is best symptomized by the innovations in military and related statecraft featured in the writings of the follower of Cusa's follower Leonardo da Vinci, and the participant in the defense of the sovereign republic of Florence, Niccolo Machiavelli. This revolution in statecraft which found its concentrated expression in the work of Machiavelli, stood as a great strategic rock against which the reactionary forces of the Habsburg tyranny had wrecked themselves in the course of the storms of religious warfare of the persistently recurring, 1492-1648 orgy of religious and related warfare.

The results of this had included the catastrophic failure of the Council of Trent. That failure, which was, in effect, chiefly the failure of the older ("Aristotelean") party of imperial Venice. a failure expressed as the practical political-strategic outcome of the Council of Trent. This was the failure which cleared the pathway for the rise of the new design of Satanic forces from within that oligarchical party of Venice then led by Paolo Sarpi.

The popular name for that evil, New Venetian Party, still today, is the Anglo-Dutch variety of Liberalism presently typified by the British empire of today, that currently under the typical guise of the Queen's banker Lord Jacob Rothschild, et al., as typified by the implicitly bankrupt, presently hyper-inflated Inter-Alpha Group which controls 70% of the World's Banks as a method of Imperial Control of all Currencies, Countries and Nations in the World.

There are, of course, original features in the development of that British Empire and its Oligarchical supporting families in every country of the World of today, but, at the same time, that British Empire is only a new variant from the same families who ruled in Sodom and Gomorrah, Babylon and Slave founded Corruption that was Rome among a series of imperialisms defined as a product of the same system of a maritime cultural form of originally Delphic, Mediterranean-centered imperialism which emerged from the ruin of ancient Greece in the Peloponnesian War.

With the birth of what became the British Empire, as through the course of the British East India Company's triumph through its organization of the leading nations of continental Europe into a "Seven Years War," every effort to free the peoples of Europe from that recurring continuation of the British Empire, has failed until now, despite what proved to be the temporary defeat of the British Empire by President Franklin D. Roosevelt's United States.

Roosevelt's successor, Churchill-steered and Wall Street-controlled President Harry S Truman, like Andrew Jackson earlier, betrayed the United States to the cause of British imperialism and its Oiligarchic Supporting families. The British empire made concessions to the American principle for the purpose of retaining its power during difficult times, but, since the successful assassination of the obstacle to British imperial power known as President John F. Kennedy, the British Empire has, in fact, dominated the world as a true imperial power from about February 1968 until the present date.

Only poor dupes, on the way to becoming slaves, believe in the mere fiction of a "U.S. imperialism" today. The prior site of a Slave market, "Wall Street," is the only evidence which might be claimed as evidence of a "U.S. imperialism," was never, since 1763, other than a British imperial parasite and their supporting American Oiligarchy sucking the juices of Manhattan, as also many other locations from around this planet, all on British imperialism's behalf. Usually, those who argue that the U.S.A. is imperialist, turn out, on closer scrutiny to be branches of Threadneedle Street themselves, or, simply dupes of the tradition of the Karl Marx who had worshipped Adam Smith almost as a pagan god. Imperial Britain now controls 70% of all the Banks in the World as a method of Imperial Control of all the Currencies, Countries and Nations of the World.

The Empire, Slavery & the Mind
The victors among the warring tribes of Africa often sold the selected, surviving portion of their defeated rivals into slavery. The surviving portion of the modern victims of this Africa practice's captives was transported, on the initiative of the victors in those internal wars of Africa, to the coasts of Africa, where the captives were sold to such as the Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch and British traffic in slaves, an enslavement which had begun with the delivery to port-areas of those Africans who had been enslaved by other Africans, and then delivered to the coastal ports founded by European slave-traffickers, ports whence the surviving assortment of captives was transported, still as slaves, to such destinations as the Atlantic coasts of the Americas - typically the Slave Market of, "Wall Street".

Thus, the fact that the enslaved victims of this process had been brought into slavery to the Anglo-Dutch, Spanish, and Portuguese by Africans, does not diminish the degree of criminality of those Habsburg and related oligarchical interests who shipped the victims to a condition of enslavement in the Americas, much of this being done for the profit of the Anglo-Dutch, British Empire which controlled this Atlantic trafficking in slaves which had been conducted by the lesser oligarchs of Britain's system of imperial reign over the Nineteenth Century Spanish and Portuguese monarchies.

It should not be seen as our purpose here to account for much more than the following essential fact of that matter of the origins of the slavery within North America prior to President Lincoln's victory.

The growing Americas market in such trans-Atlantic traffic in African slaves, was prompted largely by the fact that the indigenous tribes of the Americas were usually ill-suited for use as a slave-class in the Americas. The significance of the African slave was that he had been a product of the dynamics of a systemic form of customary practice of the violence of enslavement within relevant parts of Africa itself.

This was the influence under which African slaves temporarily adapted to submission to slavery in an Americas where the African had no roots, where the indigenous American tribes, such as the case of the literate culture of the pre-Andrew Jackson, Cherokee nation, were not as well suited for a system of slavery, much better suited for genocide.

The process of the subsequent liberation of the slaves in our U.S.A., the liberation from the British empire's authority over the continuing Spanish and Portuguese traffic into slavery within our republic, was, therefore, shaped largely by a powerful lurch toward personal freedom within our own republic itself, a struggle of various sorts, but one rooted in the emergence of the American cultural climate of intellectual freeing of the former slave.

It was the slave's desire for children of marriage, combined with the indispensable role of President Abraham Lincoln's dedication to a victorious war against Lord Palmerston's British imperialism for defense of the U.S. republic, which secured the indispensable freeing of the slaves in the only way it could have occurred, as Frederick Douglass understood, violently, that by the action of our Federal Republic against the British system of trans-Atlantic slavery.

Then the Opium Wars of 1850 in China where Imperial Britain forced the, "Free Trade" of selling Opium from Imperial India to the Chinese Nation over the wishes of the Chinese Emperor. Britain won the War, won Hong Kong (Using the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank - HSBC - for drug receipts) for 200 years and won the right to keep on selling Opium to China.

The principle which I have invoked in presenting this example from the history of mankind's effort for freedom from enslavement of man by man, is to be found on a still deeper level, in the principle named Psychic Charge, or dynamics (e.g., dynamis) by Gottfried Leibniz, or what is the same principle of dynamics illustrated in the concluding summary in Percy Bysshe Shelley's A Defence of Poetry.

This return to the subject of dynamics now brings our attention back to our principal subject in this report, the distinction of the higher functions of the human mind from the undeniably indispensable, but qualitatively inferior functions of the human brain.

This is accomplished most effectively by avoiding what Riesman et al. might prefer to describe as merely an "other-directed" shaping of the social-identity preferences of the new individual; the child must not "be good" merely because this prompts favorable responses by parents and others. The child must discover that the good aspect of his or her nature is also an efficient power in the universe, the power of creative discovery. Of this, the child might say: "I can prove it for myself," or express the same point of view in asking the question "why, Daddy?"

If Daddy replies to the child's "Why?," with the irrationalist's: "Because your mother told you to do it," the child is being degraded thus into a cultural outlook of the "irrationalist-noun" variety. Better reply by Daddy would be either, "Come, I'll try to show you why," or, if the matter is beyond the child's reach, "When you're a little older, you'll be able to work this out for yourself." If a child, asked what the child wishes to become in adulthood, replies, "I'm going to be...." ask that child "Why?" lithe child replies, in effect: "Then I'll be able to...," the implicit morality of the child's argument informs us of the probable direction of moral development occurring in that young person. If a child locates a sense of moral identity in the development of efficient powers of discovery, the processes of moral development are to that degree predominant, to that degree mastering the contrary, hedonistic impulses.

The same principles of development are also characteristic of cultures.

Purgatorial Immanual Kant reacted strongly against the immorality of David Hume. See I. Kant's Prolegomenon . . . , and also his preface to the first edition of his Critique of Pure Reason.

What Kant denounced, with as much vehemence as Kant's public practice permitted him, was the immorality of that thesis of Philosophy which is the basis of all Economics, all Politics, as taught in all Universities and used in the parliaments of every country in the World.

A Murderous Philosophy of the Inferno which forms the central principle of Hume, of Adam Smith, of Jeremy Bentham, and "nineteenth-century British philosophical radicalism." Hume, Smith, et al. argued that the imperfection of man's reason prevented the individual, or society, from pre-calculating the consequences of choices of behavior among the individual members of society, or by society as a whole. [Hence, Kant's charge of "philosophical indifferentism" against Hume.]

This argument was employed by Hume, Smith, et al. Adam Smith was a protege of David Hume, and most directly influenced by Hume 's Treatise of Human Nature, the chief reference-point for Smith's own 1759 Theory of the Moral Sentiments. The doctrine of the Invisible Hand (Which so Goosed the World in the latest Ponzi Scheme Housing Bubble of many Bubbles over the past few thousand years) is derived directly from the cited line of argument, in the Wealth of Nations...

To propose that individual actions should be governed solely by "original and immediate instincts. . . of love of pleasure, and of dread of pain." - Adam Smith, Theory of the Moral Sentiments - is immoral and at worst, Satanic - created to control a population of Psychopaths, from the Inferno.

And the Banking Monetary System and Casino Slave Market Wall Street Economics of the Cayman Hedge Funds of the West is based upon this type of Philosophy - the Philosophy of the Satanic Inferno.

And this World as it is, is the result..

As far as it went purgatorial Kant's extensive rebuttal, against this satanic empiricist morality from the Inferno, was sound. The fallacies otherwise embedded in Kant's argument, already concomitants of the earlier Critiques, showed themselves at their worst in Kant's Critique of Judgment and his commentaries on aesthetics generally.

It was on the latter point that Kant was most directly and efficiently corrected by the Friedrich Schiller Kant otherwise admired so much. Kant's essential argument on morality was presented in relatively most compact form in his Critique of Practical Reason.

Summarily, Kant argued that the Law, the "repression" of prohibited kinds of impulses and acts by society negated those hedonistic impulses within the individual. This is the equivalent of the Old Testament Laws of Moses:- Ten Commandments graven in stone, and taken down from the mountain.

However, this "repression" was not merely a negation. Since this negation made the individual a social person, the negation corresponded to the individual's vital self-interest in establishing and maintaining a social identity. The desire for this social identity negated the negativity of "repression" [negation of the negation]; in this way, morality was described as made positive [by such "negation of the negation"]. The Glass-Steagal separation of banking and speculation - "The Law" and not, the "Self Regulation" of the Inferno - comes from this type of Philosophy.

Paradisian Schiller corrected Kant on this point, showing that effective productions of the creative-mental potentials of the individual are a directly knowable form of the Good, and that, hence, morality need not be premised merely on the kind of double-negativity which Kant prescribed. Apart from this specific correction of Kant's views on aesthetics, the entirety of Schiller's later productions of drama are based on the principle he cited against Kant's error. This is the philosophy of the New testament of Jesus Christ, not based on Moses Laws graven in stone but only on Love. The free will, only to do the right thing!

The inferno is Oligarchy which exists in each country - for example, The British Secret Service  - under "M" - who was Jeremy Bentham at the time and his Boss, Prime Minister of Britain and Head of the Slavery and Drugs East India Company, Lord Shelburne, who Created the French Revolution and Jacobin Terror in Paris. Who created Napoleon to, like the 30 Years War and the Seven Years War before him, destroy the competing economies of Europe, - Russia of Count de Witt, France of Lazarre Carnot and Germany of Leibniz, Schiller, Humbolt, Gauss, Reimann, Mozart and Beethoven; which resulted in the consolidation of the British Empire over the world at large.

Lord Shelburne like all Agents of Influence of the Secret Services of the Babylonian and Roman Oligarchies, for Thousands of years, also fostered as well as Bentham who when he died, like any Black Magician, mummified himself and placed his mummified body in his favourite bar in London, in a glass case with his severed head placed under his arm, also fostered and paid the philosophers, Hume, Adam Smith, Darwin and Malthus - all spoor of the pit, all created in the inferno. Yet modern Economic, Monetarism and Political Philosophy is based upon these creatures. Thus the result..

Other Agents of Influence..

Aristotle of the Babylonian Secret Service, who poisoned Alexander the Great who was influenced by Plato and who destroyed Babylon.

Then Abbe Conte and Paolo Sarpi of the New Babylon Oligarchic Venetian (Phoenician) Secret Service who arranged for puppet William of Orange to take over London, the new Babylon, in 1732. The Philosophy of Hume, Bentham, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Malthus, Darwin and Reductionist Lord Bertrand Russell and his provenly false - by Goedel - Principia Mathematica written together with Whitehead, is based upon the work of Aristotle and Sarpi whose aim was to dumb down science, put out the fire and thus create human poverty and thus Oligarchic Control.

Human Beings are creatures of Fire.

Man is the only animal who consciously uses Fire. And it is Fire which has led to all human progress, Economic and Spiritual.

The Bronze Age and Iron Ages were all based of increasing temperatures of Fire of the Crucible of the Alembic.

The increase of Flux Density of Nuclear and Fusion Fire is needed to drive the modern Rich Economies of a future World of plenty - as a platform of Production. To start, incredibly efficient Fourth Generation nuclear reactors can burn safely for a Billion years with the fuel already mined to give almost free electricity. To desalinate sea water to make all deserts bloom. To concentrate rich commodities from poorer ore. To stop the scare city of petroleum created by the Oiligarchy and thus the necessity of War.

Spiritual Alchemy is based upon the Myth of Aeschylus' "Prometheus Bound" where Oligarchical Zeus bans Fire from nascent Humanity - so as to stop his progress. So as to stop his Evolution. So as to stop his Illumination!!

Schiller said famously: "the century has produced a great moment," referring to the trans-Atlantic movement led by Benjamin Franklin, "but," referring to the rise of the Jacobins in France, "the moment has found a little people."

Using his resources as a leading historian of his time, Schiller composed a series of tragedies based on leading problems of statecraft in modern history of nations. Although Schiller employed some dramatic license, to deviate slightly from events as they had actually occurred in terms of individual personalities of the drama, the problems posed in each drama were true-to-life insofar as the tragic events as a whole were concerned.

The function of these dramas, as Schiller himself described in considerable detail in his writings or his methods of composition, was to show to audiences that in the course of critical events the point is reached at which an available solution is clear, but in which influential figures and general populations each fail to act upon that solution; the failure to act so then traps the population in a tragic development which the population is thereafter unable to resist. These immensely popular tragedies of Schiller have been proven to have been the single leading moral influence which later mobilized the German people to fight the successful Liberation War against Napoleon Bonaparte—a war led by such friends of Schiller's as Freiherr vom Stein and Wilhelm von Humboldt.

It is possible, in fact, as well as abstract scientific reflections, to mobilize a leading force of a people to foresee more or less accurately the outcome of the policy-actions of nations, and also the contributions to those actions by individuals.

Although Kant was admitted to the inner elite of the circles around Schiller, Koerner, von Humboldt, et al., it was Schiller, not Kant, who made possible the defeat of Napoleon's tyranny—just as the 1815 Congress of Vienna, and Metterrnich's Prussian agent G.W.F. Hegel, launched an inquisition against the writings of Schiller, as well as against Schiller's friends, in the effort to reverse the republican achievements of 1809-1814 under von Stein, Scharnhorst, Humboldt et al. The efficient power to uplift a people, morally, and in its general condition otherwise, is direct access to and service of the creative-mental principle.

Nonetheless, Kant's thesis of the Critique of Practical Reason is an exceptional insight into the mechanisms of mind as a resident of the second level of morality - Dante's Purgatory. Kant's morality is of a Soul coming from the Inferno towards Purgatory.

He is not a resident of Paradise, not one of Schiller's "Beautiful Souls" as Schillers morality is that of a Soul moving from Purgatory to Paradise.

The resident of Purgatory, like Kant, adheres to morality with a sense of duty, and is always conscious of duty as in some sense an act of self-denial, an act of "repression" of his bestial, irrationalistic [anarchistic, existentialist] "original and immediate instincts."

At worst, the resident of Purgatory is fortunately not a radical empiricist of the sort recommended by Hume, Smith, Bentham or John Stuart Mill, - not a resident of the Satanic Inferno.

Even among the best modern republics, such as our own has been during its best periods, the development of our culture, and the maturation of individuals within that culture, has been defective to the degree that the moral strata of our electorates have been chiefly residents of Purgatory, not Beautiful Souls.

This defect of even moral populations was a subject of special attention by Plato. notably in his Republic. He stipulated that the design of republics must therefore be such as to efficiently deal with such defects of maturation within the electorate generally. He argued, as Solon of Athens had argued the importance of writing out his constitutional poem to guide Athens thereafter, that a people must bind itself to a written body of constitutional law, and practice obedience to that law, rather than relying upon its own independent judgment; hence, in modem times, we speak of our republic as a government under law, rather than as a government by men.

It were desirable that electorates be dominated by Beautiful Souls—residents of Dante's Paradise. Lacking thus far that circumstance, we must compensate for the defects in our own people by choosing republics premised upon constitutional law. For obvious reasons, Plato described this expedient arrangement as "the second-best form of republic."

It should be seen readily enough, that the philosophical outlook of the residents of Paradise is characteristically of the religious-cultural species we identified as "rational-verb," and Inferno's "irrationalist-noun."

It is "human nature" that the moral impulses of the individual and cultures composed of individuals, are not more than two: the irrationalistic, hedonistic impulses which echo the "original and immediate instincts" of a beast, in opposition to the creative-mental potentials. the divine spark which distinguishes man from the beast. Hence, only two generative impulses are possible within individuals and cultures.

The behavior of the individual, under the conflicting influence of such two impulses, is always governed by what rigorous clinical psychology can distinguish in each instance as a controlling sense of personal social identity.

Individual judgments are not premised on the individual's sense of biological identity, but of social identity subsuming biological identity. This choice of social identity regulates the person's definition of "self-interest." This sense of identity, and notion of self-interest, is defined primarily by which of the three types of moral identity (Inferno, Purgatory, Paradise) the individual has adopted. That is, the individual identifies either:

(I) Completely with irrationalist hedonism ("original and immediate instincts"),

(2) completely with a "Kantian" sense of social identity (Purgatory), or

(3) creative-mental life of the Higher Hypothesis, chakras higher than the mind, above the head (Paradise).

That choice of identity defines perceived self-interest. This sense of self-interest directs the exercise of judgment. Judgment so directed determines human activity, and also determines how the individual judges the results of his activity.

The first, the choice of the Inferno as the location in which one's identity (and self-interest) resides, is dominated by subordination of rationality to "original and immediate instincts," as Dante describes this so aptly.

The second, the Kantian, might appear, at first glance, to have a dual identity, a conflict between morality and "original and immediate instincts," Yet, as Kant argues correctly to that degree, the resident of Purgatory locates his or her identity in the moral "sense of duty" to prohibit those actions of "original and immediate instincts" which are prohibited by the morality.

The third, Paradise, prompts the individual to locate his or her identity, and self-interest, in that policy of self-development and practice which fosters predictably some durable benefit to present and future generations.
 

It might appear, to superficial observation, that the resident of Paradise and Purgatory eat and clothe themselves in similar manner.

Yet, the resident of Paradise views these matters quite differently than does the Kantian. "I require that which affords me the power to contribute to present and future generations": for the Kantian, the end-result of the morally permitted form of sensuous individual experience is the individual pleasure or other individual benefit of the individual in himself.

For the resident of Paradise, the individual benefit of such sensuous experience is limited to its universal consequences, the contribution of that individual sensuous experience to the individual's power to accomplish some necessary good for present and future generations.

The sense of self-interest embodied in the individual action is different. Such a distinction may appear almost indiscernible in an isolated action of this sort; it becomes clearly discernible when we compare the general policies of ordering of personal life between Beautiful Souls and Kantians.

The Beautiful Soul subordinates what might be defined as a Kantian sort of self-interest to a higher purpose, a universal purpose. Imagine Friedrich Schiller eating and drinking his favorite wine during the periods his life was dedicated to fashioning tragedies intended to uplift the German people to a state they would not repeat those errors of France through which the Jacobins came to power; that is the eating and drinking of a Beautiful Soul.

Only two kinds of opposing impulses exist within individual persons; the bestial impulses of irrationalist "original and immediate instincts," opposing the sense of beauty in efficiently developing and exercising creative-mental potentials in service of universal good. These two, opposing impulses permit only three categorical kinds of personal identity to occur within individuals and cultures. We witness only two opposing forces in the making of all human history and pre-history, and we witness only three categorical cultural types emerging in this sweep of human existence as a whole. We witness such because nothing else were possible.

Clearly, the following table of comparisons from Dante Alighieri's Commedia follows:
 

Identity Cultural Matrix Religion

This summary table is adequate to guide us in interpreting those characteristics of cultures bearing upon the potential of those cultures to foster and assimilate fundamental scientific discovery which speeds up the richness and wealth of that society.

The ascent from baboon-like gathering-cultures toward civilization is implicitly inevitable, since the divine spark of creative-mental potential is that which absolutely, categorically distinguishes mankind from baboons. It were worse than absurd to attempt to adduce the "evolutionary development" of human characteristics from the great apes, as if by aid of Boltzmann's LaPlaceian theory of fluctuations. Human development depends upon a quality categorically absent from the great apes, some feature of the human organization corresponding to the human soul, congruent with the verb "to think creatively." and Psychic Charge!!

This is the characteristic of human cultures, which distinguishes "human ecology" absolutely, categorically from "animal ecology." To attempt to apply like Darwin or Malthus, "animal ecology" to mankind is an absurdity in principle, as absurd as applying the "ecology" of "societies of rocks" to the biosphere or noosphere.

The possibility of Paradise/Illumination is implicit in the human soul; that is not only a theological doctrine, but the one empirical fact about human existence which is absolutely incontestable, man's increase of his species' potential relative population-density through technological progress.

On the path of Illumination we have the development of the neoplatonic outlook focussed in the analysis of Plotinus in direct connection with Plato's Timeus. The consubstantiality of the divine and man in Christ is defined as the unity of the necessary being with mortal (ephemeral) man brought to maturity of perfection.

The consubstantiality of the Trinity was the unity of the necessary being, the higher hypothesis and the perfected particular man - in the Antahkarana.

Through the addition of the energy of the Logos, a higher chakra above the head, human beings become educated in the conception of Plato from egotistical- infantile-sensual lovers of satanic orgies of Hume, Mills and Bentham (Platos Bronze souls - Dantes Inferno) to sensual infantilism educated to logical rationality, Kantian understanding  (Platos Silver Souls - Dantes Purgatory)  and the actually mature human beings of Reason, using the Higher Hypothesis of Schillers Pure reason - connected to the Intuition of the Logos, (Platos Golden Souls  - Dantes Paradise) - Illuminated/Enlightened - Energy Enhancement.

And when you see such a person, you say, "I suppose you think you're really good don't you"?"  if you are a demon monkey!! - see the Story of the Monkey in my Commentary on the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali.

Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, a psychopath, an Energy Vampire born of the Pit, of the Inferno, without a Soul, born with a superior olfactory sense, creates the world's finest perfume. His work, however, takes a dark turn as he searches for the ultimate scent.

It's a funny old movie which inculcates one into the Heart of Darkness

Grenouille means Frog which is appropriate - Ugly and French.

This guy is a mass murderer, but why does he do it?

Well, in this movie, scent or perfume symbolises the energy of the Soul which is pure Love.

Poor Grenouille has a horrible life devoid of love.

More, with his super power nostrils he knows that he has no scent, no Soul, no Love.

He knows he is a psychopath!!

He has no empathy. He has no conscience.

With his super power nostrils he decides that he needs to gain a Soul.

He tries to do it by developing the Ultimate Perfume, stealing the Soul Energy scent from others - to become an Energy vampire - a practise doomed to failure.

He should have practised Energy Enhancement instead!!

First he becomes the perfect perfumier developing fantastic perfumes for Dustin Hoffman.

Dustin Hoffman the Perfumier employs Grenouille to mix his perfumes.

Because he has no Soul and is a psychopath, Grenouille thinks nothing of killing to attain energy - vampirisation.

To make the perfect scent he has to kill twelve young ladies and mix together their Soul essences.

Alan Rickman tries to save his daughter from Grenouille

Tried, he is sentenced to death on the scaffold in the town square.

Grenouille on the scaffold, throws his Kerchief into the crowd

On the scaffold he takes one drop of his perfume and puts it on a handkerchief. Another behind his ears.

As the  Soul Energy scent wafts through the air to all the people present, they see him as Jesus Christ.

Even Alan Rickman, whose daughter he has murdered kneels at his feet and weeps tears of joy in the presence.

As the Love Energy of the Soul mix affects everyone present, they all get together in an orgy.

Lords and ladies. Priest and Whore all get it together on the ground.

When they wake the next morning they are ashamed and slink away.

Grenouille is gone!!

Yet Grenouille now knows that this energy he has stolen, Vampirised, is not his.

He knows he has no Soul connection of his own and that the search for his Soul is the search for illumination.

Real Energy Vampires call other human beings their cattle, the Geese who lay the Golden Egg,  whose energy they eat in order to live, having no energy connection with God from whom to take energy like normal human beings.

In order to maintain their power for thousands of years they need to distract and pervert humanity through NEGATIVE ENERGY FIELDS FILLED WITH IMPLANT ENERGY BLOCKAGES, bad education, food, poverty, low science, low economy and continuous War.

It says in the movie that he knows he could use this perfume to seduce Kings, live in palaces, obtain millions of money.

Yet Grenouille knows that what he has is NOTHING!

Without a Soul. Without that Ultimate perfume of his own Soul, life is nor worth living.

"To gain all the World but lose his Soul" - Many people - ALL ENERGY VAMPIRES - are very content with this, yet not Grenouille!!

In this, Grenouille is not normal!

He goes to Paris, and in the marketplace, the place he was born, he stands and pours all the Soul Love Essence perfume over his head.

Like Count Ungolino of the Divine Comedy's Inferno, eating his children.

Like the Holy Host - the Seed Soul Energy of Jesus Christ - consumed by the people in the Mass, Grenouille is eaten by all the crowd.

Nothing remains.

He is Gone!!

ENERGY ENHANCEMENT PSYCHOPATH DIRECTORY

GO TO THE PSYCHOPATH DIRECTORY FOR THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY BLOCKAGES IMPLANTED IN RITUALS DURING SOME OF YOUR PAST LIFETIMES - IN THE HEART - REMOVING EMPATHY AND ABOVE THE HEAD, REMOVING CONSCIENCE IN ORDER TO CREATE PEOPLE WITHOUT MORALS,  "MORAL IDIOTS" BUT SOMETIMES WITH HIGH IQS.

LIKE HERE BELOW..

- SCRIPT OF HORROR MOVIE

It is interesting that the first scene of the movie starts with an Interpol Police agent friend of Clive's dying from a heart attack. This myocardial infarction is later proven to be caused by a poison dart.

Recently, the 27th October 2010, President Kirchener of Argentina served by his own personal doctor, who stood up to the IMF banking system after 2003 to save Argentina from ruin because of its National debt, in the same way that Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy, France are now threatened by ruin, sadly died from a heart attack at the age of 60 years.

In The International, Interpol Agent Louis Salinger - Clive Owen - and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman - Naomi Watts - are determined to bring to justice one of the world's most powerful banks - like the International Bank of Credit and Commerce - run by Elite people who feast on human suffering.

Uncovering illegal activities including money laundering, arms trading, and the destabilization of governments by rent-a-terrorists who later become indebted Presidents of the country, Salinger and Whitman's investigation takes them from Berlin to Milan to New York and to Istanbul.

Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as the bank will stop at nothing - even murder - to continue financing Armaments and Terrorists to put their men in charge of Governments, to Control Governments and thus their people through IMF National Debt and personal debt, Assassination and War.

This movie, shows how society and its Police Forces, District Attorneys, and Politics protects its own so that it is impossible to bring the Elite to justice.

Like Peter Jackson's, "The Lovely Bones", it also shows that it is not necessary for one person to bring anyone to justice. Justice is not the province of one man. There are better things to do with one's life.

Universal Karma - will take care of it all by itself as in this movie the Elite's families battle it out by themselves, army to army, country to country, and anyone who gets in their way is assassinated.

As Zen Master Hogen says, "Don't get caught!" by stupid ideas and thoughtforms.

Clive tells a the two sons of an Italian Mafia family that their father, the President of Italy, was assassinated by the bank.

They send their Mafia hit man to assassinate all in the bank involved in his murder.

Thus karma and justice are served!!

The Bank's President and it's head Lawyer are assassinated, but the vice President of the bank takes over the bank and the bank continues its corrupt and evil way.

As the president of the bank says to Clive Owen before being shot by the Mafia, "You only want to kill me because of your own Blood Lust. Killing me will serve no useful purpose. There are thousands of bankers just like me who will take over my job in an instant!"

Clive Owen, who refused the assassin role of James Bond, was created to do movies like this as his energy, again, propels the story and the script.

Like Keanu Reaves in Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula, the Matrix and Constantine, he is a spiritual actor.