HYAKUJO MEDITATION ZEN TURNING OF YOUR VISION
HYAKUJO MEDITATION ZEN TURNING OF YOUR VISION...
The
mind of a buddha will only see flowers all around. The mind of a buddha
reclining will see the moon and the stars and all that is beautiful in the
darkness of the night. Whether it is morning or evening, it does not matter, the
no-mind only reflects the most precious, and the so-called mind that we have is
only concerned with the ugliest
--
it is barbarous.
BELOVED
OSHO,
ON ONE OCCASION HYAKUJO SAID, "IF WE ARE ATTACHED TO A VIEWPOINT THAT
WE ARE NATURALLY THE BUDDHAS AND THAT WE ARE IN ZEN BUDDHISM BECAUSE WE ARE
ORIGINALLY PURE AND ENLIGHTENED, WE ARE AMONG NON-BUDDHISTS WHO DENY
CAUSALITY."
AT ANOTHER TIME A VINAYA MASTER NAMED YUAN ONCE CAME TO HYAKUJO AND ASKED,
"DO YOU MAKE EFFORTS IN YOUR PRACTICE OF THE TAO, MASTER?"
HYAKUJO REPLIED, "YES, I DO. WHEN HUNGRY, I EAT; WHEN TIRED, I
SLEEP."
YUAN ASKED, "AND DOES EVERYBODY MAKE THE SAME EFFORTS AS YOU DO,
MASTER?"
HYAKUJO ANSWERED, "NOT IN THE SAME WAY. WHEN THEY ARE EATING, THEY
THINK OF A HUNDRED KINDS OF NECESSITIES, AND WHEN THEY ARE GOING TO SLEEP THEY
PONDER OVER AFFAIRS OF A THOUSAND DIFFERENT KINDS. THAT IS HOW THEY DIFFER FROM
ME."
AT THIS, THE VINAYA MASTER WAS SILENCED.
ON ANOTHER OCCASION, THE VENERABLE TAO KUANG ASKED HYAKUJO, "MASTER,
WHAT MENTAL PROCESSES DO YOU EMPLOY IN PURSUING THE TAO?"
HYAKUJO ANSWERED, "I HAVE NO MENTAL PROCESSES THAT WOULD BE OF USE,
AND NO TAO TO FOLLOW."
TAO KUANG ASKED, "IF BOTH THOSE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, WHY IS IT THAT
EVERY DAY YOU CONVENE GATHERINGS DURING WHICH YOU URGE OTHERS TO LEARN HOW TO
FOLLOW THE TAO BY MEANS OF ZEN?"
HYAKUJO SAID, "THIS OLD MONK DOES NOT POSSESS EVEN A DOT OF GROUND IN
WHICH TO STICK AND AWL."
"WHY, MASTER, YOU ARE LYING TO MY FACE!" EXCLAIMED TAO KUANG.
HYAKUJO REPLIED, "HOW CAN THIS OLD MONK, BEING WITHOUT TONGUE TO URGE
PEOPLE, TELL A LIE?"
"I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE WAY THE VENERABLE ZEN MASTER TALKS,"
SAID TAO KUANG.
WHEREUPON HYAKUJO SAID, "NOR DOES THIS OLD MONK UNDERSTAND
HIMSELF."
Maneesha, this series of talks is entitled THE GREAT PEARL, HYAKUJO, WITH
THE HAIKUS OF BASHO. Hyakujo is immensely expressive and knows what he is doing
and how to bring people to the unknowable.
Basho never wrote prose. Basho is one of the greatest poets in the world.
His greatness is not in his poetry -- there are far greater poets as
far as the composition of poetry is concerned. His greatness is that his poetry
is not just verbiage, is not just putting words together according to a certain
pattern, his poetry is an experience.
I have put them together because Hyakujo never wrote any poetry. His
approach is very prose and direct, and the haikus supplement what is missing in
the prose. Basho expressed himself very graphically. His experiences are more
paintings than poetry. And his understanding is -- and I agree with
him -- that where prose fails, poetry may succeed. Poetry has a more
feminine way, more subtle, more graceful, entering into the heart.
Prose directly enters into the head and immediately becomes a concern of
logic and reason. Poetry has a different root, a different path. You don't bring
in rationalization as far as poetry is concerned. Something else becomes stirred
in you, something deeper than the mind. Poetry cannot be a logical statement. It
is an existential statement -- what Basho himself has seen he has
tried to put into words. Hence I have put together two great masters.
The name, THE GREAT PEARL is Hyakujo's old name in Chinese. His childhood
name was Chu, and Chu means pearl. Both are Himalayan peaks, and together they
are going to create a tremendous harmony. What prose can say in a very
straightforward way, poetry cannot say in that straightforward manner. But there
is much that is left out. Poetry can pick up that which is left out because it
has no obligation to any logic, no obligation to any grammar, no obligation to
any formulation. It has a certain freedom which prose has not, so it can say
things that prose will become embarrassed to say. The Great Pearl applies to
both. They both are the most beautiful Zen masters.
Before I discuss Hyakujo's and Basho's sutras... Yesterday I introduced
you with a biographical note on Hyakujo. Today I want to introduce you with the
biography of Basho.
The Japanese haiku poet, Basho, was born in 1644, the son of a samurai in
the service of the lord of Ueno castle. As a young boy, Basho became the page
and study companion of the nobleman's eldest son, and together they learned,
among other skills, the art of making verse.
On the death of his master, Basho went to Edo -- now Tokyo --
where he studied verse under Kigin. He then became a disciple of the Zen master,
Buccho.
Basho's fame as a master poet spread. He began to attract disciples of his
own.
Journeying became Basho's life-style, providing him with a chance to
observe and write of nature, with which he felt such a deep affinity.
He once wrote, "All who achieve greatness in art possess one thing in
common: they are one with nature. Whatever such a mind sees is a flower, and
whatever such a mind dreams of is the moon. It is only a barbarous mind that
sees other things then flowers, merely an animal mind that dreams of other than
the moon."
The flower and the moon are only symbolic. What he is intending to say is
that the really silent mind can only see the greatest in existence, the most
beautiful, the most truthful. He can see only flowers and moons. In his status,
in his height, he cannot see the mean and ugly things of which the human mind is
so filled up. He calls this mind, which has not known the experience of
emptiness, a barbarous mind -- a beautiful definition of a barbarous
mind.
The mind of a buddha will only see flowers all around. The mind of a
buddha reclining will see the moon and the stars and all that is beautiful in
the darkness of the night. Whether it is morning or evening, it does not matter,
the no-mind only reflects the most precious, and the so-called mind that we have
is only concerned with the ugliest -- it is barbarous.
When Hyakujo returned to Yueh Chou, he lived a retired life, concealing
his abilities and outwardly appearing somewhat mad. It was at this time that he
composed his sastra, called, "A Treatise Setting Forth the Essential
Gateway to Truth by Means of Instantaneous Awakening."
Later, this book was stolen and brought to the Yangtse region and shown to
Ma Tzu. After reading it carefully, Ma Tzu declared to his disciples: "In
Yueh Chou there is now a great pearl. Its luster penetrates everywhere freely
and without obstruction."
Ma Tzu was making a pun on Hyakujo's original surname of Chu. Hyakujo was
Ma Tzu's disciple and finally his successor.
Maneesha has asked these sutras for today:
BELOVED OSHO,
ON ONE OCCASION HYAKUJO SAID, "IF WE ARE ATTACHED TO A VIEWPOINT THAT
WE ARE NATURALLY THE BUDDHAS AND THAT WE ARE IN ZEN BUDDHISM BECAUSE WE ARE
ORIGINALLY PURE AND ENLIGHTENED, WE ARE AMONG NON-BUDDHISTS WHO DENY
CAUSALITY."
Now, this is something to be understood and it is one of the most debated
subject matters for centuries: if enlightenment is sudden, that means there is
no cause to it. It can be sudden only if it has no causality. If it has any
cause, first the cause has to be produced, then enlightenment will follow.
Science believes in causality. You provide all the necessary causes, and
this will be the inevitable outcome. But Zen, in the sense of sudden
enlightenment, drops the idea of causality. There is no cause that leads to
enlightenment -- and Hyakujo is making it clear. If no cause, no
causality, leads to enlightenment, the reason is that enlightenment is not an
effect; cause and effect are joined together. Enlightenment is not an effect of
any cause; it is already there. The effect is in the future.
That which is already there, needs no cause. It needs only a turning of
your vision. That is not a cause. It needs only a remembrance. That is not a
cause. What is already there, in this very moment, requires no causality.
Causality produces something. It is already perfectly present; nothing has to be
added. All that is needed is to wake up and see.
Seeing is not a causality, you have to understand it. That's why no
method, no device can be said to be absolutely certain to lead you to
enlightenment. All that it can do, is to trigger a certain process in you so
that you start looking inwards. It can produce the looking inwards, but it
cannot produce your enlightenment. If you honestly and urgently look inwards,
the buddha is there. Your enlightenment explodes in thousands of ways; it has
been just waiting for your eyes.
All Zen masters have been talking about methods, about devices. The reason
is that there is no way to introduce you to your own buddha, your own nature. It
is so deep down inside you, it cannot be made objective. It cannot be said,
"Look, this is your nature. Say hello to it. Get introduced." Nobody
can introduce you to your own nature. Hence, all these devices which are in a
way lies, are desperate efforts of the masters somehow to force you to look
inwards. Then everything will happen on its own accord.
... A VINAYA MASTER -- vinaya is the whole Buddhist scripture
-- NAMED YUAN ONCE CAME TO HYAKUJO AND ASKED, "DO YOU MAKE EFFORTS IN
YOUR PRACTICE OF THE TAO, MASTER?"
HYAKUJO REPLIED, "YES, I DO. WHEN HUNGRY, I EAT; WHEN TIRED, I
SLEEP."
Such a great and beautiful statement contains so much, oceans of meaning.
"YES, I DO", says Hyakujo, "WHEN HUNGRY, I EAT; WHEN TIRED,
I SLEEP." He is saying, "I simply go with nature. I am no more, only
nature is: tired, it goes to sleep; hungry, it eats. Neither do I interfere nor
do I make any effort in the sense `effort' is understood."
Yuan asked a necessary question, "AND DOES EVERYBODY MAKE THE SAME
EFFORTS AS YOU DO, MASTER?"
HYAKUJO ANSWERED, "NOT IN THE SAME WAY. WHEN THEY ARE EATING, THEY
THINK OF A HUNDRED KINDS OF NECESSITIES, AND WHEN THEY ARE GOING TO SLEEP THEY
PONDER OVER AFFAIRS OF A THOUSAND DIFFERENT KINDS. THAT IS HOW THEY DIFFER FROM
ME."
A clear-cut differentiation. If you can understand this, you will
understand the difference between a buddha, who looks almost human, and other
human beings. Their actions are the same: the buddha eats when he is hungry, he
sleeps when he feels tired; so you do. On the surface there seems to be no
difference. The difference is inside: when the buddha is eating, he is simply
eating; there are no other thoughts in the sky of his mind. His whole attention,
his whole awareness, is just concerned with the act in the present --
eating. When he is asleep, he is simply asleep. He does not dream, he does not
wander here and there with a thousand anxieties and problems; he has none.
Asleep, he is simply asleep.
Modern psychoanalysis has to come to an understanding. They have not yet
dared. They have only been studying what Hyakujo calls the barbarous mind. All
their conclusions and their whole science will remain absolutely incomplete
unless they explore the mind of a buddha. That will bring a tremendous
revolution in the whole psychoanalytical movement, because on the surface the
buddha is exactly the same as you are. But you can see the point: while you are
eating, you are thinking a thousand and one thoughts; while you are sleeping,
you are dreaming of faraway lands, or maybe repressed desires.
It is sad that even while you are making such a deep and intimate act as
love, you are not loving the woman you are making love to, you are thinking of
Sophia Loren. And don't think that it is only you who is thinking of Sophia
Loren, the woman you are making love to, is thinking of Mohammed Ali. On every
bed there are four fellows. This is the barbarous mind: never in the moment,
always going astray.
Hyakujo put the difference with the enlightened man very clearly: when
hungry, eat; when tired, sleep. Don't do anything else. Always remain contained
in the moment, contained in the act. Raising hands, just raise your hand; don't
think of anything else. Sitting, just sit; walking, just walk. Every act should
be so concentrated that it does not allow other thoughts to enter in.
A simple understanding of this can make one a buddha, because this will
bring your whole consciousness together to such a point that it becomes almost
an arrow. And whenever your consciousness becomes an arrow, it starts moving
towards the origin of your life. All devices are just to make your consciousness
an arrow and with an urgency, so that it moves. You are not far away. It is just
a small journey, but it takes people millions of lives to fulfil it because they
never move even an inch inwards.
"... AND WHEN THESE BARBAROUS MINDS ARE GOING TO SLEEP, THEY PONDER
OVER AFFAIRS OF A THOUSAND DIFFERENTS KINDS. THAT'S HOW THEY DIFFER FROM
ME."
AT THIS THE VINAYA MASTER WAS SILENCED.
He was only a scholar, he had no idea of the inner world. He has absolute
control of the outer objective, philosophical concepts, but he has no idea at
all from where his life arises, from where his consciousness arises, where the
roots of his very being are. He was completely silenced by the master. He could
not utter a single word, but he could not become enlightened either. He could
not ask anything more, he could not answer the master. He simply became silent,
knowing that he was entering in an unknown territory. He knows the sastras, the
scriptures perfectly well, but he does not know anything about this
"eating, eat; walking, walk; sitting, sit."
This is the problem with the scholars: they go on missing the authentic
master. They come to understand, but they come to understand the word not the
experience.
AT THIS THE VINAYA MASTER WAS SILENCED.
ON ANOTHER OCCASION, THE VENERABLE TAO KUANG ASKED HYAKUJO, "MASTER,
WHAT MENTAL PROCESSES DO YOU EMPLOY IN PURSUING THE TAO?"
HYAKUJO ANSWERED, "I HAVE NO MENTAL PROCESSES THAT WOULD BE OF USE,
AND NO TAO TO FOLLOW."
This is the ultimate statement of a witness. There are no mental
processes. He has left the mind far behind, and there is no goal of Tao, or
Dhamma. He himself is the goal; he is the buddha. He is Tao, he is Dhamma; he is
the truth itself. Now, there is no question of any mental processes or any goal
of Tao.
TAO KUANG ASKED, "IF BOTH THOSE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, WHY IS IT THAT
EVERY DAY YOU CONVENE GATHERINGS DURING WHICH YOU URGE OTHERS TO LEARN HOW TO
FOLLOW THE TAO BY MEANS OF ZEN?"
That is the way intellectuals function. He has not understood Hyakujo's
great statement, he has simply analyzed it and found that there is a
contradiction. But this man says there is no mental process that would be of any
use, and there is no Tao to follow. If this is true, then why does this man go
on teaching great assemblies. You have to see how intellectuals function and how
they miss.
He asked him, "IF BOTH THOSE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE, as you say, WHY IS
IT THAT EVERY DAY YOU CONVENE GATHERINGS DURING WHICH YOU URGE OTHERS TO LEARN
HOW TO FOLLOW THE TAO BY MEANS OF ZEN?"
That can be asked of any master. Even the master himself is very much
concerned.
I have told you that Gautam Buddha did not speak for seven days after his
enlightenment. When asked, he said, "I have been pondering for seven days
whether to speak or not, and I cannot find any reason to speak. There are no
means that I can teach to people that will lead them inevitably to
enlightenment. There is no goal to be achieved so people can be shown the path.
"People want some understanding about what discipline is to be
followed -- what cause is going to produce buddhahood. There is no
cause. So, all these seven days I have been thinking that whatever I say will
not be exactly true. Should I say it or keep quiet? To be silent seems to be
more honest and more truthful but a little unkind -- unkind to those who are still staggering in darkness, unkind
to those who are very close to the source. Just a little help, a little push,
may make them buddhas."
But it is not so easy. If you push somebody he becomes angry. Your push is
not necessarily going to be understood as a compassion. The person may become
more ugly than he was by your push. He may become more barbarous. He may stand
up to fight with you asking, "Why did you push me? Why did you said this?
Why did you expose me?" The work of the master is not just full of roses.
It is one of the most delicate works of art to help a man become a buddha. A
slight mistake and everything is spoiled. And the problem is not the master, the
problem is the disciple. How the disciple is going to take your word is not
within your control.
So Buddha said, "I am thinking not to speak at all. Those who are
capable of becoming buddhas will become buddhas -- a little late perhaps -- and those who are too
much involved in darkness and mundane activities are not going to listen to me.
They will simply waste my time and will be angry at me that I am wasting their
time."
But
the people who were urging him said, "You are ninety-nine point nine
percent right, but please think of the point one percent. You may fail with
ninety-nine point nine percent of the people, but you may succeed in helping one
person out of one hundred to become a buddha. This is such a great event that
those failures can be simply forgotten -- they don't matter. Anyway they were not going to become
buddhas; you need not be worried about them. But think of that point one
percent. You will be very unkind to those who are just on the periphery. A
little push, a little kindly word that gives them a sense of urgency; a little
look in their eyes that gives them the depth that they also contain; a little
touch of love, the warmth of a buddha, just his gesture..."
And Buddha agreed. His agreement is
one of the greatest agreements that has been made in human history. He could
have disagreed. There was no way to force him, but then something great would
have been completely forgotten. At least it is remembered here and there. Some
people still become buddhas, still reach to the same heights, because they know
somebody has already traveled the path. "If one man is capable of becoming
a buddha, then there is no reason why I cannot become a buddha." This gives
great courage, and great encouragement.
But the intellectual mind, not
understanding the inner process of enlightenment, noncausal, nonlogical,
immediately jumps to the conclusion that there is a contradiction. Here you are
saying that there are no mental processes which are of any use. By your mind you
cannot reach buddhahood, you will have to drop the mind, so what is the use of
mental processes? Mind as a whole entity has to be pushed aside so that you can
see clearly and directly, without any thoughts gathering in front of your eyes.
There is no goal. The moment you find utter silence and a deep understanding of
yourself, your roots, you simply have a laugh
-- just a laugh that "I
have been searching for the person who is hiding behind me, inside me, at my
very center."
But he immediately asked,
"There is a contradiction because you teach people to meditate, you teach
people certain devices. What is the point?"
HYAKUJO SAID, "THIS OLD MONK
DOES NOT POSSESS EVEN A DOT OF GROUND IN WHICH TO STICK AN AWL."
He is saying that he does not
possess any mind to answer and satisfy your contradiction.
"WHY, MASTER, YOU ARE LYING TO
MY FACE!" EXCLAIMED TAO KUANG.
That is an eternal problem: the
master has to lie. And if you think only of his lying, you will never understand
that he was lying out of compassion, and that those lies were just preparing a
ground for you to take a jump in.
I will tell you an old story....
A king was very much interested in
a young man who always remained underneath a tree, sitting silently. Every night
the king passed around the city in disguise to see whether everything was right
or not. He always found that young man sitting like a statue, without any
movement.
Finally, he could not contain his
curiosity. He stopped his horse and he said, "Young man, forgive me for
disturbing your meditation."
The young man opened his eyes and
he said, "There is no need for any apology because I am not meditating, I
am meditation -- nobody can disturb it. But whatever your curiosity is, please
fulfill it."
The king said, "I would love
you to come to my palace. I will take care of you. There is no need to sit under
this tree. Seeing you so silently, like the ancient story of Buddha, I have
fallen in love with your silence, your gestures, your utter undisturbance. I
invite you to come with me to my palace. I am the king."
This is how the barbarous mind
functions. The king asks the young man to come to his palace
-- inviting him
-- but deep down his
unconscious wants him not to accept his invitation because that will mean he is
still desirous of luxuries and palaces.
But that young man simply stood up,
and he said, "I am coming."
Immediately the whole scene
changed. The mind of the king was thinking, "What have I done? This man is
still interested in the luxuries of a palace, being the guest of a king. This is
not a great saint." This is the old idea of the saint, that he should be as
uncomfortable as possible. Discomfort is religion. Sick, hungry, torturing
oneself in thousands of ways... and then you become a great saint. This fellow
has suddenly fallen from his sainthood, in the mind of the king. But now it was
too late. He could not take his word back; it would be to ungentlemanly.
But the young man was watching
everything. He didn't say anything. The king provided for him in the best part
of the palace, servants, young girls to look after him
-- and he accepted
everything. With each acceptance he was falling down in the scale of
saintliness: what kind of saint was he? He accepted a beautiful king-size bed.
He accepted all the delicacies of the palace.
The king said, "My God. What
kind of a stupid person am I? This man has deceived me. It seems like he tricked
me. Just sitting there every night, he knew I passed at that time, sitting
silently like a buddha, he knew that I would be caught
-- and he caught me. And now
it is very difficult either to swallow him or to spit him out. He is inside the
palace."
But how long can you carry such a
state of mind?
After six months, one day early in
the morning when they were taking a walk together in the gardens, the king said
to him, "One question has been continuously harassing me and I want to get
rid of it. Because of it, for six months I have not slept well."
The young man said, "You can
ask any question."
The king said, "It hurts me to
ask, but I want to know what the difference is between me and you. You live in
the palace, you enjoy all the luxuries... what is the difference between me and
you?"
The young man said, "I knew
that this question was going to arise one day. In fact, it arose the same moment
I stood up to follow you. You are not a very courageous man. You should have
asked immediately. Why waste six months, and for six months unnecessarily
disturbing your sleep. I can answer your question but not here. You have to come
with me outside the boundary of your kingdom."
It was not far away. Just a few
miles away was the river, the boundary of his kingdom.
The king said, "What is the
need to go there? You can answer me here."
He said, "No. There is a
need."
Both went past the river. Standing
on the other shore, the young man said, "My answer is that I am going
ahead. Are you coming with me?"
He said, "How can I come with
you? I have a palace, I have a kingdom, I have my wife, my children... I have
thousands of worries and problems to solve. How can I come with you?"
The young man said, "Do you
see the difference? I am going. I don't have any palace, I don't have any wife,
I don't have any problems. I was as happy under my tree as I have been happy in
your palace --
not a bit more or a bit less. My awareness is the same whether I am in a
palace or in a forest."
The king felt very sad at his ugly
mind, that he thought such an ugly thing. He touched his feet and he said,
"Forgive me even to think this. In my own eyes I have fallen."
The young man said, "No. Don't
do it. Seeing your tears and you touching my feet I have no difficulty, I can
come back, but you will still start thinking, `My God. Has he deceived me
again?' I have no difficulty but so as not to be uncompassionate towards you, I
will not come. Just let me go. The whole world is there and I don't need much,
just a tree to sit underneath. It does not matter to me at all."
Now the king became more insistent,
"No, come back, otherwise I will be worried and hurt and wounded, thinking,
`What have I done?'"
The man said, "You are putting
me in difficulty. I am telling you I can come, but remember, you will again
start thinking, `What is the difference?'"
The barbarous mind only thinks of
the meanness, of the mediocrities. He does not have any heights to look at.
HYAKUJO REPLIED, "HOW CAN THIS
OLD MONK, BEING WITHOUT TONGUE TO URGE PEOPLE, TELL A LIE?"
Now the intellectual must have
become even more suspicious. The old monk Hyakujo says, "HOW CAN THIS OLD
MONK, BEING WITHOUT TONGUE..." Now this is apparently a lie: "WITHOUT
TONGUE TO URGE PEOPLE, TELL A LIE?" --
but he is perfectly right. These are the worlds beyond our ordinary,
mediocre lives. A man of enlightenment does not speak, he simply allows
existence to speak through him. He does not see, he allows the buddha inside him
to see through his eyes.
That's why, once in a while,
somebody receptive enough can look into the eyes of the master, the eyes of a
buddha. He has no tongue of his own anymore. He has given everything to
existence. He is no longer in possession of the tongue, of the eyes, of the
hands. Now, whatever existence wants to do with him, he simply goes with it. His
whole life is just a let-go. But the intellectual will not understand. Now it is
absolutely making a lie even more clear: "I don't have any tongue"
-- and he is speaking. He is
saying, "How can I lie without a tongue?"
The problem for a master is that if
he speaks, he defiles the truth. However he tries, he cannot bring the truth
into words. Just a little fragrance maybe, only for those who are intelligent
enough to feel the difference. The same words are being used by a master as are
being used by you, but the master's words are not empty, your words are empty.
When you say to someone, "I love you," you don't mean it. Perhaps it
is a social custom. When a master says, "I love you," his love is not
an empty word.
But you need to have great
intelligence to figure out the fragrance that is carried by the words or the
actions. And remember, to be intellectual does not mean to be intelligent. The
intellectual is a great scholar; he has much knowledge, but he may not be
intelligent. And a man who knows nothing, a farmer or a woodcutter or a
fisherman, may have intelligence. He will not have intellect
-- he does not know anything
about the intellectual world --
but in his functioning...
When the Soviet Union emerged from
the revolution... The capital during the czars' rule was Petrograd, it was not
Moscow. Petrograd was named after Peter, one of the czars. Because of this
association, communists changed the capital to Moscow. But before changing it
-- it took years
-- they had to function in
Petrograd.
Just in front of the palace of the
czar there was a huge rock that prevented anybody, any vehicle, to pass in
front. It was considerately kept there so that nobody passed and disturbed the
czar. You could go on any other street but you could not move on the street in
front of the palace. The rock was so huge that the communists were worried about
what to do with it. It had to be removed, but its largeness prevented all
removal. They called architects and engineers and they all thought about many
ways, either to cut it into pieces --
but that too was not easy... They were all worried and there was no
solution coming out.
An old farmer was just leaning on
his staff, standing there, watching with all these great engineers, architects,
politicians, and when he saw that they were not able to find any solution, he
said, "I am just a farmer and I don't know anything. I don't know what
engineering is, and what architecture is. I have just heard these words here,
but as I understand, you want to remove this rock. It is a very simple
thing."
Lenin himself asked, "You say
it is a very simple thing? Please tell us what your idea is."
He said, "There is no idea.
There is no need to remove the rock. Just dig around the rock and go on digging
and taking out the mud from underneath the rock, and then finally force the rock
down so it becomes part of the road."
It was so simple, so intelligent,
that all those architects and engineers were at a loss because they were
thinking in conceptual terms from their books, their university degrees, and
this poor man had nothing but a practical intelligence.
He said, "It is such a small
thing. Just dig around the rock, then pull out as much mud as you can from
underneath the rock and then force it down. It will settle in the hole and be a
part of the road. And it is such a beautiful rock, it should not be removed. It
will make such a beautiful part of the road in front of the palace."
The farmer's instructions were
exactly followed and the rock is still there in front of Petrograd's palace.
Intelligence is a clarity,
intellectuality is a borrowed knowledge. The intelligent person would not have
said this to the master: "You are lying to my face! You tell people about
devices and means, and to me you are saying there are no means and no devices,
and that there is no goal either."
He could not rise to the height,
and he could not understand the difficulty of a master, that he has to bring
something from the high peaks of experience to the marketplace. He has to use
the same words, and he has in some way to create an urge, a longing. The very
urge and longing is not there. Have you ever thought in your dreams that you
want to become a buddha? Have you ever wondered where the source of your life
is?
The master has to make goals which
are not goals for you. He has to tell you that it is a great pilgrimage, that to
find the truth you have to travel very far and you have to discipline and
cultivate yourself, because the human mind is interested only in the difficult,
it is not interested in the obvious and the simple. There are reasons why it is
not interested in the obvious and the simple: the simple does not satisfy your
ego. You will not go into the street shouting, "I have just peeled a
banana! I need my photograph in the newspaper. The first man has peeled a
banana." People will laugh at you that you are mad
-- you are yourself a banana.
Small things, but when somebody
goes to the top of Everest, the whole world becomes interested. All the news
media declare that the first man has reached the top of Everest. The difficult
is attractive because it gives you the ego. The simple is unattractive because
you cannot claim any ego on its part. The master has to make a goal of
buddhahood although he knows you are the buddha. But he knows perfectly well
that even if he tells you that you are the buddha, you are not going to trust
him. I tell you every day, "You are the buddha." Have you ever trusted
me?
Anando, in her anger, sent a
message to me that she is suspicious. Suspicious of what
-- suspicious certainly
about my provoking you to be a buddha. I don't have anything else to do here.
Suspicious about what? You are suspicious about your own potential and I have to
hammer on your head continuously. So, for this series, I have given the name
Anando to Nivedano's drum. So he goes on hitting every day until she comes to
her senses. Suspicious? But that is not only her problem, it is the problem of
every intellectual -- Anando is a
law graduate.
"I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE WAY
THE VENERABLE ZEN MASTER TALKS," SAID TAO KUNG. You are speaking and you
say that you don't have a tongue. You go on teaching about devices and goals,
and you say there are no mental activities of any use, and there is no goal
either.
WHEREUPON HYAKUJO SAID, "NOR
DOES THIS OLD MONK UNDERSTAND HIMSELF." He accepted that he does not even
understand himself. "Only existence knows what he is using me for. I am
absolutely available to existence. If he wants to lie through me, I will lie. If
he wants something else to be done through me, I will do it. I have completely
dropped myself into the hands of the cosmos."
Hyakujo is saying something of
tremendous importance: a master is absolutely absent as far as his individuality
is concerned; he is absolutely present as far as his cosmic experience is
concerned. And you need to have some intelligence, some heart, to understand it.
Now this beautiful story..... more..
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT
THE CORE ENERGY TECHNIQUES !!
ENERGY
ENHANCEMENT, !!! ULTIMATE !!!!!! ANCIENT !!! !!! EFFECTIVE !!!!!
SUCCESSFUL !!!
1. Get into Intense alignment with Your Own Kundalini Energy and Immediate
Access to the Meditative State.
2. Remove your Energy Blockages with The Circulation of the Energies, the
Kundalini Kriyas, Ancient Taoist Energy Circulations which have worked
effectively for 5000 years to help all towards ENLIGHTENMENT.
3. The Grounding of all your Negative Energies through Alchemical VITRIOL -
Become Incredibly POSITIVE and ENERGETIC!!
4. Alignment with Your Higher Self - INCREASE YOUR IQ, INCREASE YOUR LUCK,
ACCESS YOUR HIGHEST ENERGIES!! ACHIEVE WHAT YOU WERE PUT ON THIS PLANET TO DO.
5. Learn how to USE and Increase the LOVE of Your Heart Center to ZAP YOUR
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND DEVELOP PSYCHIC POWERS TO HEAL YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
6. Overcome ENERGY VAMPIRES - MASTER ENERGY PROTECTION AND MAINTAIN YOUR HIGH
ENERGIES!!
7. EXPERIENCE INCREDIBLE RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENERGY ENHANCEMENT - THE CORE ENERGY
TECHNIQUES
8. ENERGY ENHANCEMENT Techniques are the source of all Successful spiritual
training courses over the last 5000 years. Become a Jedi Master, a Gandalf, a
Transmitter of the FORCE a Bringer of the Light!!
GET MORE ENERGY!!!
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT -
!!! ULTIMATE !!!
!!! ANCIENT !!!
!!! EFFECTIVE !!!
!!! SUCCESSFUL !!!
Goto and SIGNUP NOW!!
http://www.energyenhancement.org/HomeStudyMeditationCourse.htm
A
haiku by Basho....
MAD WITH POETRY,
I STRIDE LIKE CHIKUSAI
INTO THE WIND.
"Mad with poetry..." If
you are not mad, your poetry will be very poor. Poetry which is sane will be
ordinary, prosaic, just a composition of words without any essential meaning
running through it. To be a poet is in a certain sense to be mad.
MAD WITH POETRY,
I STRIDE LIKE CHIKUSAI
INTO THE WIND.
It has not been recognized by the
religions of the world. I want to make it an absolute discontinuity with the
past in the sense that I don't consider the older saints to be authentically
religious. They can be divided in two categories -- either they
are masochists who enjoy torturing themselves, or they are sadists who enjoy
teaching people to torture themselves, who enjoy others torturing. And it is
possible that one man may be both --
he may enjoy torturing himself and he may enjoy torturing others.
Most of the saints belong to the
psychologically sick people, and the real religious people have not been taken
in account. They are the poets, the dancers, the painters, the musicians, the
sculptors. All kinds of creative people are the truly religious people, but no
religion accepts them as religious because these people are functioning
according to their nature, not according to any scripture. These people are
almost part of the universe.
One very rich woman asked Picasso,
a great painter of our times, "You have never done portrait. You have done
so many beautiful paintings, but no portrait. My only desire is to have a
portrait of myself made by you. And don't think about money. You say it and it
will be given." The woman was super rich.
Picasso wanted to tolerate her but
he could not tolerate the money. He was in immense need of money. Just for his
paintings he needed money, but he did not want to make a portrait, knowing
perfectly well that when he started painting he forgot himself, so that what
came out may not look like this woman. So he said to her, "Listen... ten
million dollars."
She said, "Okay. Start the
work."
He said, "My God. I asked for
ten million so as not to get involved in this work. I have to explain to you
that when I start painting, I forget myself. The colors catch me so hard, their
beauty becomes so immense, that I don't know what I am doing; the painting
starts painting itself. That's why I have never done a portrait, but if you
insist, I will make an effort --
and I cannot lose ten million dollars. But you have to make me a promise: you
cannot criticize my painting on any point."
She said, "Agreed."
The painting was done. The woman
could not understand what had happened. She could not find where she was in the
painting at all. It was a beautiful painting
-- great colors, very
psychedelic, but it was not a portrait. And she had agreed not to criticize so
she said, "I am not criticizing, but I just want to know where my nose is,
so from that point I can figure out where I am."
Picasso said, "This is the
difficulty. I had told you beforehand that when I paint, I forget. Now I don't
know where your nose is. You take the painting and meditate over it. Sometime
you may find that this is your nose, and then figure out... around it there may
be some eyes, a mouth."
The woman said, "This is a
strange kind of portrait that I have to figure out where my nose is."
Once it happened, a rich man came
and he wanted, "Picasso, two paintings, immediately." Picasso had only
one painting ready so he went in and cut the painting in two.
The girlfriend who used to be with
Picasso, said, "What are you doing?"
He said, "I cannot miss that
customer. He is a rich man and he wants two paintings. I will make two paintings
immediately. Anyway nobody can discover what the painting is, whether it is
together or in two parts." He made two paintings, and he sold two
paintings.
Those who have purchased his
paintings, even in great museums, find it difficult to know how to hang them
-- which way up... which way
down.... You can hang them any way. They are beautiful, but you cannot make any
sense of that beauty.
And another haiku by Basho:
FOR HIS MORNING TEA
A MONK SITS DOWN IN UTTER SILENCE
--
CONFRONTED BY CHRYSANTHEMUMS.
"For his morning tea a monk
sits down in utter silence..." Tea has become associated with Bodhidharma,
who introduced Zen into China. He loved tea, and strangely, it helps you to be
awake; otherwise, sitting silently, one tends to fall asleep. So tea has become
a special Zen thing. He is just depicting a picture. Under the tree of
chrysanthemums, a monk sits in utter silence for his morning tea. Nothing is
said -- just a silent monk waiting for his tea.
These haikus are, as I have said to
you, paintings in words.
Question 1
A question by Maneesha:
BELOVED OSHO,
I WOULD BE DISHONEST IF I DID NOT
SAY I ALSO HAVE BEEN JEALOUS, I HAVE NOT ALWAYS RECEIVED FROM YOU WITH GRACE; I
HAVE WANTED TO BE YOUR FAVORITE GIRL. I DON'T THINK I HAVE ACTED ON THOSE
FEELINGS, BUT PERHAPS I HAVE DONE IN SUBTLE WAYS.
IT IS NOT THAT I ONLY BECAME AWARE
OF ALL THIS LAST NIGHT, OR THAT BY YOUR POINTING OUT CERTAIN THINGS ABOUT ANANDO
MEANT THE REST OF US WERE FREE OF THOSE SAME THINGS. I KNOW WE ALL HAVE THE SAME
FAILINGS. I KNOW, YOU KNOW, BUT I JUST NEEDED TO SAY ALL THIS TO YOU
-- FOR MY SAKE, IF YOU WILL
ALLOW ME, OR FOR THE RECORD.
Maneesha, this has to be very
clearly understood: that whatever I am saying to one person, everybody has to
look within himself to see whether that is applicable to him also. I cannot talk
to each of you differently; it is an impossibility. Every person to me is
symbolic. What I said about Anando is just symbolic -- you all have
to ponder over it. Perhaps the same tendencies, the same unconscious feelings,
jealousies, greed, ambitions may be hiding in you. Most probably they are.
Before enlightenment you all have this barbarous mind. Anando is not an
exception, nor are you an exception, Maneesha
-- and it is perfectly okay.
What is needed is an awareness that
these things are within you. Nothing has to be done. Just watch them and they
will wash out. But what do people do? --
they do something to the contrary. They repress them, they pretend that
"others may have jealousies we don't have." They pretend that
"others may have anger we don't have." They go on repressing all their
ugliness in the unconsciousness. This is not going to be helpful in your
awakening. These unconscious repressed desires, feelings, attitudes, are all
going to become a hindrance to your enlightenment.
My effort, in different ways
-- answering your question,
or telling a joke, or talking about strange sutras of strange people
-- is simply to help you
face your own repressed mind. Once you encounter it, then the only secret to be
learned, which I teach every time, is to witness them. Don't do anything. Don't
condemn them, otherwise they will immediately go deeper into the darkness of
your unconscious mind. Don't condemn them, don't appreciate them, otherwise they
will become attached to your conscious mind. Don't make any judgment for or
against.
Just witness, as if you have
nothing to do with them. Witnessing is the greatest device that has been found
by the whole of the past enlightened people. It cuts through all rubbish just
like a sharp sword: don't get identified; just remain aloof and watch. Anger is
there, take note of it and just watch how it arises, how it spreads like a
mushroom, how it covers you like a blinding force; how it starts making
decisions for you, how you start acting according to it.
Just watch, and you will be
surprised that it cannot do anything. As it arises, it will not even go to the
point of becoming a mushroom because it can become a mushroom only by
nourishment. By watching it you have cut the very nourishment. It will arise as
a crippled anger which cannot stand up even, and soon it will disperse like
mist. It has no reality except your identification.
It is good of you, Maneesha, that
you have taken note of it. Anando is also calming down. Here you are to become
buddhas, not stupid buddhas, because such a thing has never existed in the world
-- a stupid buddha.
Now it is Anando's time....
Princess Diana and Princess Fergie
are the wives of Prince Charles and Prince Andrew of England.
Soon after Fergie has arrived to
live in the palace, Diana offers to take her on a bicycle tour of the London
sights. Fergie is delighted and they set off, pedaling through the palace gates.
Diana knows all the shortcuts
through the London traffic, and soon the two princesses are bouncing along on
their bicycles over the cobblestones in the small back streets.
"Wow! Di!" cries Fergie,
giggling and squealing, her ample body vibrating like jelly, "I have never
come this way before!"
"Really?" says Di,
"I guess it must be the cobblestones!"
Big Leroy, the black American
football player, and Rabbi Sapperstein, the Jew, are riding in a train together.
It is a hot, sunny day, and there
are many flies, lazily buzzing around the compartment. Suddenly, a fly lands on
the Rabbi's sleeve and he brushes it off in disgust.
A few moments later another fly
lands, but this time on Big Leroy's leg. The giant football star moves like
lightning, and grabs the fly between two of his huge black fingers.
Leroy then slowly pulls off both
the fly's wings and pops it into his mouth, chewing it contentedly.
Soon afterwards, a fly lands on the
Jew's sleeve again. But this time, instead of brushing it off, the rabbi grabs
it between two of his long, boney fingers.
He then slowly removes both of its
wings, leans over to Leroy, and says, "Wanna buy a fly?"
Kowalski is out for a drive in the
countryside in his new Chevrolet car. He stops on the top of a hill and gets out
to admire the view.
It is a beautiful, peaceful scene,
with a black horse and a white horse chomping grass in the field nearby.
Satisfied and breathing a deep
sigh, Kowalski gets back into his Chevy, but the car will not start.
He gets out, walks around to the
front of the car, opens the hood and looks in dismay at the engine.
He is wondering what to do when the
white horse trots up, leans over the fence, sticks his head under the hood, and
says in a deep voice, "Your spark plugs need cleaning!"
Kowalski is shocked and terrified,
and runs off to the nearby farmhouse. He sees the farmer in the yard, and rushes
up to him.
"My car has broken down,"
stammers Kowalski, "and one of your horses told me to clean the spark
plugs!"
"Really?" replies the
farmer. "Was it the black horse or the white one?"
"The white one," gasps
Kowalski.
"Pity," says the farmer.
"The white one does not know a thing about cars!"
Doctor Braino is a world-famous
shrink who specialized in secretly treating neurotic American politicians. It is
a hopeless job, but he carries on anyway.
One day, Senator Donald Dixteen,
the thirty-five-year-old Republican Fundamentalist Christian Reagan-lover is
sitting nervously in Dr. Braino's office.
"What can I do for you?"
Braino asks Donald.
Donald looks around to make sure no
one can hear him. Then, in a quiet voice he says, "Doc, I'm not having any
luck with women. I try to be cool... I try to be real hip cat, but I'm afraid
that I'm a premature ejaculator... I always come too soon."
"Well," says Braino,
studying Donald closely, "when does this usually occur with the
woman?"
"Well," says Donald,
looking around, "Usually between `Hello,' and `What is your sun
sign?'"
Anando...
(Drumbeat)
(Gibberish)
(Drumbeat)
Be silent. Close your eyes. Feel
your body to be completely frozen. Now look inwards with great urgency, as if
this is the last moment of your life.
Deeper and deeper... Collect your
whole consciousness as an arrow and go in search for your very source of life.
There you will find the buddha.
Sitting silently, this is your real
being. This moment you all have become buddhas.
To make it more clear...
Nivedano...
(Drumbeat)
Relax. Watch your body as separate
from you. Watch your mind as separate from you. You are just a witness, just a
mirror reflecting all that is around you. A buddha is nothing but a mirror. From
this point, of being a buddha, a witness, you can take another jump and dissolve
yourself into the oceanic consciousness. Just within two steps, the journey is
complete.
Thousands of flowers are showering
on you. A deep silence, an immense space utterly empty but full of great
potentialities. In this space you will find the truth, the meaning of life, the
beauty of everything in existence, and the goodness of every being. Those who
have come to this point will carry it around the clock, just hiding it behind
their heartbeats.
So act like a buddha: eat when you
are hungry, but don't think of anything else. When you are tired, go to sleep,
but don't ponder about a thousand worries. Each moment should be given your
total consciousness -- and you have
come home.
It is so peaceful, it is so
blissful. This evening was already beautiful, but ten thousand buddhas make it a
miracle, a magic moment. If you are intelligent enough, you can make this moment
a transformation of your whole life.
Now, gather all the flowers, the
fragrance of this moment --
you have to bring it back.
Collect all the great pearls.
You are at the very source of
everything.
Nivedano...
(Drumbeat)
Come back, but come back as a
buddha, witnessing silently. Get up, sit down for a few moments, recollecting
the space you have traveled, recollecting the experience that you have
encountered. This has to become your very life-style.
Not for a single moment be
suspicious about your buddhahood.
Your buddhahood is your nature, act
accordingly. The more you act accordingly, the more is the possibility of a
growing trust in your being a buddha. The more intelligent can instantly pass
through the transformation. The old self dies away, and a totally fresh new
being is born -- innocent, pure.
Okay, Maneesha?
Yes, Osho.
Can we celebrate the ten thousand
buddhas?
Yes, Osho!
OSHO - Hyakujo: The Everest of
Zen Series 9 Chapter 2
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT
THE CORE ENERGY TECHNIQUES !!
CLICK BELOW TO GO TO
Take your time, this site has much new wonderful information. |
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT OSHO MEDITATION ARTICLES INTRODUCTION TESTIMONIALS EE DIRECTORS EE FAQS EE LEVEL1 EE LEVEL2 EE LEVEL3 EE LEVEL4 EE DVD VIDEO COURSE EE ONLINE COURSE COURSE IN ARGENTINA COURSE IN SPAIN COURSE IN PERU + IGUAZU EE COURSES INDIA TOUR EE COURSES TAJ MAHAL EE YOGA TEACHER TRAINING TALKS BY SATCHIDANAND EE E BOOK EE REIKI EE TEACHER TRAINING |